0
Technical Brief

Failure Analysis of Glass-Reinforced Epoxy Pipes Under Internal Hydrostatic Pressure: A Comparison With the Split Disk Test Method

[+] Author and Article Information
H. R. Mahdavi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Tarbiat Modares University,
Tehran 14115-116, Iran
e-mail: h.r.mahdavi@modares.ac.ir

G. H. Rahimi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Tarbiat Modares University,
Jalal Ale Ahmad Highway,
Tehran 14115-116, Iran
e-mail: Rahimi_gh@modares.ac.ir

A. Farrokhabadi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Tarbiat Modares University,
Tehran 14115-116, Iran
e-mail: amin-farrokh@modares.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 24, 2016; final manuscript received November 7, 2017; published online November 30, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Reza Adibiasl.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 140(1), 014501 (Nov 30, 2017) (4 pages) Paper No: PVT-16-1173; doi: 10.1115/1.4038484 History: Received September 24, 2016; Revised November 07, 2017

In this paper, the ultimate hoop strength of an industrial (±55 deg)9 filament-wound glass-reinforced epoxy (GRE) pipe as a short-term test is determined according to the ASTM D-1599 standard by performing the internal hydrostatic pressure test. After the test, the failure surface of the pipe is photographed by a high magnification camera, and in addition, the explanations are presented about the type of failure. The main purpose of this study is to compare the results obtained for the ultimate hoop strength and failure mechanisms of the pipe by using the internal hydrostatic pressure test with that by the split disk test method according to the ASTM D-2290 standard in the previous work.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Martens, M. , and Ellyin, F. , 2000, “ Biaxial Monotonic Behavior of a Multidirectional Glass Fiber Epoxy Pipe,” Compos. Part A, 31(9), pp. 1001–1014. [CrossRef]
Soden, P. D. , Kitching, R. , and TSE, P. C. , 1989, “ Experimental Failure Stresses for ±55 ° Filament Wound Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic Tubes Under Biaxial Loads,” Composites, 20(2), pp. 125–135. [CrossRef]
Rousseau, J. , Perreux, D. , and Verdiere, N. , 1999, “ The Influence of Winding Patterns on the Damage Behaviour of Filament-Wound Pipes,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 59(9), pp. 1439–1449. [CrossRef]
Xia, M. , Takayanagi, H. , and Kemmochi, K. , 2001, “ Analysis of Multi-Layered Filament-Wound Composite Pipes Under Internal Pressure,” Compos. Struct., 53(4), pp. 483–491. [CrossRef]
Tarakcioglu, N. , Akdemir, A. , and Avci, A. , 2001, “ Strength of Filament Wound GRP Pipes With Surface Crack,” Compos. Part B, 32(2), pp. 131–138. [CrossRef]
Mertiny, P. , and Ellyin, F. , 2002, “ Influence of the Filament Winding Tension on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Composites,” Compos. Part A, 33(12), pp. 1615–1622. [CrossRef]
Naik, M. K. , 2005, “ The Effect of Environmental Conditions on the Hydrostatic Burst Pressure and Impact Performance of Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoset Pipes,” Master's thesis, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Meijer, G. , and Ellyin, F. , 2008, “ A Failure Envelope for ±60 ° Filament Wound Glass Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Tubulars,” Compos. Part A, 39(3), pp. 555–564. [CrossRef]
Faria, H. , and Guedes, R. M. , 2010, “ Long-Term Behaviour of GFRP Pipes: Reducing the Prediction Test Duration,” Polym. Test., 29(3), pp. 337–345. [CrossRef]
Melo, J. D. Z. , Neto, F. L. , de Araujo Barros, G. , and de Almeida Mesquita, F. N. , 2010, “ Mechanical Behavior of GRP Pressure Pipes With Addition of Quartz Sand Filler,” J. Compos. Mater., 45(6), pp. 717–726. [CrossRef]
Martins, L. A. L. , Bastian, F. L. , and Netto, T. A. , 2012, “ Structural and Functional Failure Pressure of Filament Wound Composite Tubes,” Mater. Des., 36(4), pp. 779–787. [CrossRef]
Martins, L. A. L. , Bastian, F. L. , and Netto, T. A. , 2013, “ The Effect of Stress Ratio on the Fracture Morphology of Filament Wound Composite Tubes,” Mater. Des., 49(8), pp. 471–484. [CrossRef]
Rafiee, R. , 2013, “ Experimental and Theoretical Investigations on the Failure of Filament-Wound GRP Pipes,” Compos. Part B, 45(1), pp. 257–267. [CrossRef]
Rafiee, R. , and Reshadi, F. , 2014, “ Simulation of Functional Failure in GRP Mortar Pipes,” Compos. Struct., 113, pp. 155–163. [CrossRef]
Rafiee, R. , and Amini, A. , 2015, “ Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Functional Failure Pressures in Glass Fiber Reinforced Pipes,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 96(Part B), pp. 579–588. [CrossRef]
Rafiee, R. , Reshadi, F. , and Eidi, S. , 2015, “ Stochastic Analysis of Functional Failure Pressures in Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester Pipes,” Mater. Des., 67, pp. 422–427. [CrossRef]
Mahdavi, H. R. , Rahimi, G. H. , and Farrokhabadi, A. , 2016, “ Failure Analysis of (±55°)9 Filament-Wound GRE Pipes Using Acoustic Emission Technique,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 62, pp. 178–187. [CrossRef]
ASTM International, 2004, “ Standard Test Method for Apparent Hoop Tensile Strength of Plastic or Reinforced Plastic Pipe by Split Disk Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM D-2290-04.
ASTM International, 1999, “ Standard Test Method for Resistance to Short-Time Hydraulic Pressure of Plastic Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM D-1599-99.
Hu, F. Z. , 1997, “ Fatigue of Glass Reinforced Epoxy Pipes and Joints for Offshore Applications,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The GRE pipe used in this study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) The designed fixture for testing the rings and (b) the loading conditions of the rings [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Components of the sealing fixture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) The assembled fixture and (b) schematic of internal pressure test apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Applied internal pressure versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Failure surface of the pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Failed specimen by using the split disk test method [17]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In