0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Plastic Limit Loads for Pipe-in-Pipes With Circumferential Through-Wall Cracks Based on Finite Element Analyses

[+] Author and Article Information
Se-Chang Kim, Jae-Boong Choi

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Sungkyunkwan University,
2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu,
Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Hyun-Su Kim

Power Engineering Research Institute,
KEPCO E&C,
269 Hyeoksin-ro,
Gimcheon-si 39660,
Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea

Nam-Su Huh

Department of Mechanical System
Design Engineering,
Seoul National University of Science
and Technology,
232 Gongneung-ro,
Nowon-gu 01811, Seoul, South Korea
e-mail: nam-su.huh@seoultech.ac.kr

Kyunghoon Kim

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Sungkyunkwan University,
2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu,
Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
e-mail: kenkim@skku.edu

1Corresponding authors.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 13, 2017; final manuscript received March 28, 2018; published online April 25, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Kiminobu Hojo.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 140(3), 031202 (Apr 25, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: PVT-17-1259; doi: 10.1115/1.4039846 History: Received December 13, 2017; Revised March 28, 2018

Pipe-in-pipes (PIPs) are generally applied to the extreme environments such as deep-sea and next-generation reactors due to their functionality and robustness. Thus, it is important to estimate the fracture behaviors of PIPs for integrity assessment of this unique piping system. In this work, the plastic collapse behaviors of PIPs with circumferential through-wall cracks (TWCs) are investigated based on three-dimensional finite element (FE) limit analysis, where the crack is assumed to be located at the inner pipe of PIPs. As for loading conditions, internal pressure, axial tension, and global bending moment are considered. In particular, the bending restraint effect induced by interconnection between the inner and outer pipes of PIPs is quantified through the FE analyses considering a practical range of geometries of PIPs. Based on the FE analysis results, the tabular and closed-form solutions of the plastic limit loads of the circumferential through-wall cracked PIPs are proposed, and then, validated against numerical simulations.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

U. S. NRC, 1984, “ Evaluation of Potential for Pipe Break,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, Report No. NUREG-1061.
API and ASME, 2007, “ Fitness-for-Service,” API Publishing, Washington, DC, Standard No. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. https://www.asme.org/products/courses/api-5791asme-ffs1-fitness-service
Ainsworth, R. A. , 1984, “ The Assessment of Defects in Structures of Strain Hardening Materials,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 19(4), pp. 633–642. [CrossRef]
Miller, A. G. , 1988, “ Review of Limit Loads of Structures Containing Defects,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 32(1–4), pp. 197–327. [CrossRef]
Kanninen, M. F. , Zahoor, A. , Wilkowski, G. M. , Abou-Sayed, I. , Marshall, C. , Broek, D. , Sampath, S. , Rhee, H. , and Ahmad, J. , 1982, “ Instability Predictions for Circumferentially Cracked Type 304 Stainless Steel Pipes Under Dynamic Loading,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Report No. EPRI NP-2347. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:14720466
Huh, N. S. , Kim, Y. J. , and Kim, Y. J. , 2007, “ Limit Load Solutions for Pipes With Through-Wall Crack Under Single and Combined Loading Based on Finite Element Analyses,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 129(3), pp. 468–473. [CrossRef]
Chang, Y. S. , Oh, C. K. , and Kim, H. S. , 2015, “ Parametric Stress Analyses for Low-Level Liquid Radwaste System Piping of ITER Subjected to Seismic Displacements,” Fusion Eng. Des., 98–99, pp. 2172–2177. [CrossRef]
Yahiaoui, K. , Moreton, D. N. , and Moffat, D. G. , 2002, “ Evaluation of Limit Load Data for Cracked Pipe Bends Under Opening Bending and Comparisons With Existing Solutions,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 79(1), pp. 27–36. [CrossRef]
Dutta, S. , 2012, “ Large Deformation Finite Element Analysis of Partially Embedded Offshore Pipelines for Vertical and Lateral Motion at Seabed,” Master's thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL. http://research.library.mun.ca/10450/
Tang, W. , and Xie, Y. J. , 2005, “ An Analytical Method on Circumferential Cracked Submarine Pipe-in-Pipe System,” Appl. Ocean Res., 27(3), pp. 158–164. [CrossRef]
Xie, Y. J. , Xu, H. , and Li, P. N. , 1998, “ Crack Mouth Widening Energy Release Rate and Its Applications,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 29(3), pp. 195–203. [CrossRef]
Maligno, A. R. , Citarella, R. , Silberschmidt, V. V. , and Soutis, C. , 2015, “ Assessment of Structural Integrity of Subsea Wellhead System: Analytical and Numerical Study,” Frattura Ed Integrita Strutturale, 9(31), pp. 97–119.
Kim, S. C. , Choi, J. B. , and Huh, N. S. , 2017, “ Stress Intensity Factors of Pipe-in-Pipes With Circumferential Through-Wall Cracks Based on Elastic Finite Element Analyses,” ASME Paper No. PVP2017-65646.
Kim, H. S. , Jin, T. E. , Chang, Y. S. , Kim, Y. J. , and Kim, H. D. , 2008, “ Restraining Effect of Support Plates on the Limit Loads for Circumferential Cracks in the Steam Generator Tube,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(1), pp. 135–142. [CrossRef]
Ziu, C. G. , 1995, Handbook of Double Containment Piping Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
C-CORE, 2000, An Engineering Assessment of Double Wall Versus Single Wall Designs for Offshore Pipelines in an Arctic Environment, C-CORE Publication, St. John's, NL.
Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., 2014, “ User's Manual,” ABAQUS Version 6.14, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Johnston, RI.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic illustrations for the PIP with the circumferential TWC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical FE model of the PIP employed in the present study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Expansion of yield region on the cross section of a cracked PIP as increasing global bending moment, in order from 1 to 6 (Rm/t = 5, θ/π = 0.4375, Rm,o/Rm = 1.75, and to/t = 0.25)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparisons of the proposed estimations with the FE results of PIPs with the circumferential TWCs for (a) internal pressure, (b) axial tension, and (c) global bending moment (Rm/t = 10 and to/t = 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects of crack location on the plastic limit load of PIPs under global bending moment (Rm/t = 5, θ/π = 0.5, Rm,o/Rm = 1.3, and to/t = 0.25)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

FE model of the PIP with the circumferential TWC located at Lc/Rm = 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of plastic deformation near the crack location with (a) contact and (b) noncontact conditions under internal pressure (Rm/t = 5, θ/π = 0.5, Rm,o/Rm = 1.3, and to/t = 1)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In