Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Proposal of Failure Mode Map Under Dynamic Loading—Ratcheting and Collapse

[+] Author and Article Information
Md Abdullah Al Bari

Nuclear Engineering and Management,
School of Engineering,
The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
e-mail: md.abdullahbari@gmail.com

Ryota Sakemi

Nuclear Engineering and Management,
School of Engineering,
The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
e-mail: ryou.basket@gmail.com

Yamato Katsura

Nuclear Engineering and Management,
School of Engineering,
The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
e-mail: p0cky@hotmail.co.jp

Naoto Kasahara

Nuclear Engineering and Management,
School of Engineering,
The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
e-mail: kasahara@n.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 8, 2017; final manuscript received July 7, 2018; published online August 2, 2018. Assoc. Editor: San Iyer.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 140(5), 051202 (Aug 02, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-17-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4040892 History: Received January 08, 2017; Revised July 07, 2018

Ratcheting, collapse, and fatigue are the probable failure modes which can occur under alternate dynamic loading like seismic loading. The objective of this study is to propose a failure mode map for rectangular beams by determining the conditions of occurrence of the ratcheting and collapse failure modes. The paper considers the analogy between thermal ratcheting and dynamic ratcheting. The nonlinear dynamic finite element method was used to analyze a rectangular beam model for different loading conditions. The results were plotted on a nondimensional primary and secondary stress parameter graph similar to the Bree diagram for thermal ratcheting. The similarity between thermal load and dynamic load was observed. The main difference between thermal and dynamic loading is the effect of the frequency of dynamic loading on the occurrence of ratcheting and collapse. Experimental observations of ratcheting have been obtained and are used for comparison to validate the analytical predictions. From the above results, a failure mode map has been proposed which can evaluate the occurrence conditions of ratcheting and collapse under dynamic loadings.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Miller, C. , Cubbage, A. , Dorman, D. , Grobe, J. , Holahan, G. , and Sanfilippo, N. , 2016, “ Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21th Century,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, accessed Dec. 1, 2016, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1125/ML112510271.pdf
IAEA, 2000, “ Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, No. NS-R-1.
IAEA, 2012, “ Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design Specific Safety Requirements,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, No. SSR-2/1.
IAEA, 2014, “ Considerations on the Application of the IAEA Safety Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-1791.
Kasahara, N. , Nakamura, I. , Machida, H. , and Nakamura, H. , 2014, “ Research Plan on Failure Modes by Extreme Loadings Under Design,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28349.
EPRI, 1994, “ EPRI Fatigue Management Handbook,” Fatigue Screening Criteria, Vol. 2, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI Contract No. TR-104534-V2.
EPRI, 1994, “ Piping and Fitting Dynamic Reliability Program,” Component Test, Vol. 2, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI Contract No. TR-102792-V2.
Boussaa, D. , Van, K. , Labbé, P. P. , and Tang, H. T. , 1994, “ Fatigue-Seismic Ratcheting Interactions in Pressurized Elbows,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 116(4), pp. 396–402. [CrossRef]
Watakabe, T. , Kazuyuki, T. , Akihito, O. , Makoto, M. , and Naoaki, K. , 2016, “ Investigation on Ultimate Strength of Thin Wall Tee Pipe for Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor Under Seismic Loading,” Mech. Eng. J., 3(3), pp. 1–11.
Nakamura, I. , and Kasahara, N. , 2016, “ Trial Model Tests With Simulation Material to Obtain Failure Modes of Pipes Under Excessive Seismic Loads,” ASME Paper No. PVP2016-63422.
Weiß, E. , Postberg, B. , Nicak, T. , and Rudolph, J. , 2004, “ Simulation of Ratcheting and Low Cycle Fatigue,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 81(3), pp. 235–242. [CrossRef]
Garud, Y. S. , Durlofsky, H. , and Tagart , S. W., Jr. , 1993, “ Analysis and Prediction of Fatigue-Ratcheting: Comparison With Tests and Code Rules,” ASME Paper No. PVP1993-266:23-32.
Jahanian, S. , 1997, “ On the Incremental Growth of Mechanical Structures Subjected to Cyclic Thermal and Mechanical Loading,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 71(2), pp. 121–127. [CrossRef]
Scavuzzo, R. J. , Lam, P. C. , and Gau, J. S. , 1992, “ Ratcheting of Pressurized Piping Subjected to Seismic Loading,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 114(3), pp. 315–320.
Fujiwaka, T. , Kobayashi, H. , Asada, Y. , and Shitara, C. , 2002, “ Simulation of Excessive Deformation of Piping Due to Seismic and Weight Loads,” ASME Paper No. PVP2002-1254.
Zakavi, S. J. , Zehsaz, M. , and Eslami, M. R. , 2010, “ The Ratchetting Behavior of Pressurized Plain Pipework Subjected to Cyclic Bending Moment With the Combined Hardening Model,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 240(4), pp. 726–737. [CrossRef]
Hassan, T. , and Matzen, V. C. , 1999, “ ASME Code and Ratcheting in Piping Components,” Center for Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, Report No. DOE/NE/21746--T1.
Moreton, D. N. , Yahiaoui, K. , Moffat, D. G. , and Zehsaz, M. , 1996, “ The Effect of Diameter/Thickness Ratio on the Ratchetting Behaviour of Pressurised Plain Pipework Subjected to Simulated Seismic Loading,” Strain, 32(3), pp. 91–96. [CrossRef]
Bree, J. , 1967, “ Elastic-Plastic Behaviour of Thin Tubes Subjected to Internal Pressure and Intermittent High-Heat Fluxes With Application to Fast-Nuclear-Reactor Fuel Elements,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2(3), pp. 226–238. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2004, “ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Yu, T. X. , and Johnson, W. , 1982, “ Influence of Axial Force on the Elastic-Plastic Bending and Springback of a Beam,” J. Mech. Work. Technol., 6(1), pp. 5–21. [CrossRef]
Webster, J. J. , Hardy, S. J. , and Hyde, T. H. , 1985, “ Inelastic Behaviour of Rectangular Beams Subjected to Steady Axial Load and Cyclic Bending,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 27(4), pp. 257–271. [CrossRef]
Yamashita, T. K. , Tsukimori, M. N. , Iwata, K. , and Imazu, A. , 1990, “ A Simplified Method of Evaluating Ratcheting in Bellows and a Test of Its Validation,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 42(3), pp. 263–285. [CrossRef]
Kaewkulchai, G. , and Williamson, E. B. , 2004, “ Beam Element Formulation and Solution Procedure for Dynamic Progressive Collapse Analysis,” Comput. Struct., 82(7–8), pp. 639–651. [CrossRef]
Bardet, J. P. , and Davis, C. , 1996, “ Engineering Observations on Ground Motion at the Van Norman Complex After the 1994 Northridge Earthquake,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(1 Suppl. B), pp. 333–349.
Iida, H. , Toshio, H. , Nozomu, Y. , and Masahiko, I. , 1996, “ Damage to Daikai Subway Station,” Soils and Foundations, 36, pp. 283–300.
Ichihashi, I. , 2004, “ Some Collapse Tests for the Large Scale Models of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities,” Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 4(3), pp. 465–471.
Breen, J. E. , 1976, “ Research Workshop on Progressive Collapse of Building Structures: Summary Report,” U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC.
Leyendecker, E. V. , and Ellingwood, B. R. , 1977, Design Methods for Reducing the Risk of Progressive Collapse in Buildings, (NBS Building Science Series 98), U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Hakuno, M. , and Meguro, K. , 1993, “ Simulation of Concrete‐Frame Collapse Due to Dynamic Loading,” J. Eng. Mech., 119(9), pp. 1709–1723. [CrossRef]
Isobe, D. , and Toi, Y. , 2000, “ Analysis of Structurally Discontinuous Reinforced Concrete Building Frames Using the ASI Technique,” Comput. Struct., 76(4), pp. 471–481. [CrossRef]
Miller, D. , 1959, “ Thermal-Stress Ratchet Mechanism in Pressure Vessels,” Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY.
ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation, 2015, “ FINAS/STAR r 160826 User Manual,” ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation, CTC, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
Labbé, P. , and, and Noe, H. , 1992, “ Ductility and Seismic Design Criteria,” Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, July 19–24, pp. 3659–3661.
Colombo, A. , and Negro, P. , 2005, “ A Damage Index of Generalised Applicability,” Eng. Struct., 27(8), pp. 1164–1174. [CrossRef]
Kim, H. S. , Kim, J. , and An, D. W. , 2009, “ Development of Integrated System for Progressive Collapse Analysis of Building Structures Considering Dynamic Effects,” Adv. Eng. Software, 40(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Finite element model for ratchet analyses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Analogy between thermal and dynamic ratcheting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Typical strain response in the presence of ratcheting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Proposed ratchet diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Amplification factor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The effect of dynamic response in ratchet diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Typical base acceleration input in the shaking table

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Typical strain response of occurrence of ratcheting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Configuration of plate-shaped specimen for experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of measured and predicted results in X, Y graph

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Input acceleration for collapse analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Proposed collapse diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Amplification factor at higher frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Typical strain response in the presence of collapse

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Failure mode map for ratcheting and collapse



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In