0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Prediction and Measurement of Sealing Properties of Joints Between Wavy Metal Surfaces

[+] Author and Article Information
Julien Bourniquel

CNRS, I2M, UMR5295,
Esplanade des Arts et Métiers,
Talence Cedex 33405, France;
EDF R&D,
Avenue des Renardières – Ecuelles,
Moret-sur-Loing Cedex 77818, France

Didier Lasseux

CNRS, I2M, UMR5295,
Esplanade des Arts et Métiers,
Talence Cedex 33405, France
e-mail: didier.lasseux@u-bordeaux.fr

Jean-Francois Rit

EDF R&D,
Avenue des Renardières – Ecuelles,
Moret-sur-Loing Cedex 77818, France

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 12, 2017; final manuscript received July 7, 2018; published online August 2, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Steve J. Hensel.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 140(5), 051203 (Aug 02, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-17-1258; doi: 10.1115/1.4040894 History: Received December 12, 2017; Revised July 07, 2018

The transmissivity of metal-metal sealing joints is investigated experimentally and compared to predictions obtained by modeling. The focus is laid upon a wavy surface contacting a flat rigid part, representative of a seat-to-plug contact in an internal sealing valve encountered in nuclear power plants for instance. Experimental transmissivities are obtained from water leak-rate and pressure drop measurements carried out on a model ring-shape sample seat holding a controlled wavy defect and pressed against a rigid flat plug with a controlled normal load. The sample seat surface is manufactured by face turning a tubular part under radial stress and waviness is obtained after elastic relaxation. Modeling is performed on a three-dimensional finite element model of the assembly, composed of the plug, the sample seat, and its holder. The upper sample seat surface, in which topography is recorded by confocal microscopy, is reconstructed using a modal decomposition on the basis of vibrational eigenmodes. Its lower surface, in contact with the holder, is considered as perfectly flat or with its own defects. The contact aperture field between the seat and the plug is computed for a given normal load and is used to solve the incompressible Reynolds equation with a boundary element method, yielding the transmissivity. Predicted transmissivities reveal to be in good agreement with experimental data at low clamping loads and are overestimated for larger ones. Defects on the lower surface of the seat are shown to have a significant impact on the seat-to plug contact transmissivity.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Mathieu, J.-P. , Rit, J.-F. , Ferrari, J. , and Hersant, D. , 2010, “ Residual Deformation of a Hard-Coated Valve Seat Subjected to Thermal Shocks,” ASME Paper No. PVP2010-25721.
Marie, C. , Lasseux, D. , Zahouani, H. , and Sainsot, P. , 2003, “ An Integrated Approach to Characterize Liquid Leakage Through Metal Contact Seal,” Eur. J. Mech. Environ. Eng., 48(2), pp. 81–86.
Prat, M. , Plouraboué, F. , and Letalleur, N. , 2002, “ Averaged Reynolds Equation for Flows Between Rough Surfaces in Sliding Motion,” Transp. Porous Media, 48(3), pp. 291–313. [CrossRef]
Plouraboué, F. , Prat, M. , and Letalleur, N. , 2001, “ Sliding Lubricated Anisotropic Rough Surfaces,” Phys. Rev. E, 64(1), p. 011202. [CrossRef]
Geoffroy, S. , and Prat, M. , 2004, “ On the Leak Trough a Spiral-Groove Metallic Static Ring Gasket,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 126(1), pp. 48–54. [CrossRef]
Robbe-Valloire, F. , and Prat, M. , 2008, “ A Model for Face-Turned Surface Microgeometry Application to the Analysis of Metmetal Static Seals,” Wear, 264(11–12), pp. 980–989. [CrossRef]
Marie, C. , 2002, “ Fuite monophasique au travers d'un contact rugueux: contribution à l'étude de l'étanchéité statique,” Ph.D. thesis, Université Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux, France.
Marie, C. , and Lasseux, D. , 2007, “ Experimental Leak-Rate Measurement Through a Static Metal Seal,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129(6), pp. 799–805. [CrossRef]
Lasseux, D. , and Marie, C. , 2008, “ Apparatus for Measuring the Amount of Leakage of a Sealed Arrangement,” Patent No. EP1336831.
Nitta, I. , Matsuzaki, Y. , Tsukiyama, Y. , Horita, M. , and Sakamoto, S. , 2013, “ Thorough Observation of Real Contact Area of Copper Gasket Using a Laser Microscope With a Wide Field of View,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(4), p. 041103. [CrossRef]
Vallet, C. , Lasseux, D. , Zahouani, H. , and Sainsot, P. , 2009, “ Sampling Effect on Contact and Transport Properties Between Fractal Surfaces,” Tribol. Int., 42(8), pp. 1132–1145. [CrossRef]
Vallet, C. , Lasseux, D. , Sainsot, P. , and Zahouani, H. , 2009, “ Real Versus Synthesized Fractal Surfaces: Contact Mechanics and Transport Properties,” Tribol. Int., 42(2), pp. 250–259. [CrossRef]
Vallet, C. , 2008, “ Fuite liquide au travers d'un contact rugueux: application à l'étanchéité interne d'appareils de robinetterie,” Ph.D. thesis, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris, France.
Durand, J. , Proudhon, H. , and Cailletaud, J. , 2012, “ Contact Between Rough Surfaces: Crystal Plasticity Influence on the Contact Tightness Estimation,” Blucher Mechanical Engineering Proceedings, 1(1), pp. 968–979.
Ledoux, Y. , Lasseux, D. , Favreliere, H. , Samper, S. , and Grandjean, J. , 2011, “ On the Dependence of Static Flat Seal Efficiency to Surface Defects,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 88(11–12), pp. 518–529. [CrossRef]
Samper, S. , and Formosa, F. , 2007, “ Form Defects Tolerancing by Natural Modes Analysis,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 7(1), pp. 44–51. [CrossRef]
LeGoic, G. , 2012, “ Qualité géométrique et aspect des surfaces: approches locales et globales,” Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
EDF R&D, 2018, “ Code_Aster, Structures and Thermomechanics Analysis for Studies and Research,” accessed July 25, 2018, http://www.code-aster.org
Beaurin, G. , and Mathieu, J.-P. , 2011, “ Microstructural and Mechanical Properties Evolutions of Plasma Transferred Arc Deposited Norem02 Hardfacing Alloy at High Temperature,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528(15), pp. 5096–5105. [CrossRef]
Zaouter, T. , Lasseux, D. , and Prat, M. , 2018, “ Gas Slip Flow in a Fracture: Local Reynolds Equation and Upscaled Macroscopic Model,” J. Fluid Mech., 837, pp. 413–442. [CrossRef]
Huyakorn, P. , and Pinder, G. , 1983, Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow, Academic Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the sealing test device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Machining of the wavy defect on the sample seat

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Wavy defect measured by confocal microscopy. Sample a.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Leak-rate measurement setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flow rate versus pressure drop for a clamping load of 12 kN (i.e., an apparent contact pressure Pca = 20.7 MPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Domain of validity of the low Reynolds approximation for Pca = 50 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Geometry of the first 15 defect modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Model construction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Aperture field between the upper wavy surface of the sample seat and the plug resulting from contact simulation with an apparent contact pressure Pca = 15.5 MPa. Sample a.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison between numerical prediction and experiments: (a) Sample a, (b) Sample b, and (c) Sample c. The relative difference is computed using the experimental values as the reference.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Transmissivities obtained from measurements performed on apparatus 1 (see schematic representation in Fig. 5) and 2 (see Ref. [9] for details). Transmissivity obtained with apparatus 1 is used as the reference for the % relative error.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Elevation fields on the upper (left column) and lower (right column) surfaces of the sample seats used in the experiments: ((a) and (b)) Sample a, ((c) and (d)) Sample b, and ((e) and (f)) Sample c

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison of transmissivities obtained experimentally and numerically with and without defect on the lower surface of the sample seat: (a) Sample a, (b) Sample b, and (c) Sample c

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In