Design and Analysis

The Effect of Material Models on Elastic Follow-Up

[+] Author and Article Information
James T. Boyle

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace
University of Strathclyde,
Montrose Street,
Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK
e-mail: jim.boyle@strath.ac.uk

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 1, 2011; final manuscript received February 1, 2012; published online November 6, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Dennis K. Williams.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 134(6), 061210 (Nov 06, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006127 History: Received November 01, 2011; Revised February 01, 2012

The phenomenon of elastic follow-up in high temperature piping has a long history and rules to limit its significance in design are well established. However, most design rules, and numerous associated supporting studies, have been limited to a simple power-law of creep, with variations to account for time- or strain-hardening in primary creep. A common feature of the most studies of elastic follow-up in structures subject to power-law creep is that a plot of (maximum) stress against strain—a so-called isochronous stress– strain trajectory—is almost insensitive to the creep law (in particular, the stress exponent in the power-law) and is almost linear (until perhaps the later stages of stress relaxation). A limitation of the power-law is that it assumes to be valid across all stress ranges, from low through moderate to high, yet it is well known that this is not generally the case. This paper aims to investigate the effect of stress-range dependent material models on the nature of elastic follow-up: both a simple two-bar structure (common in studies of elastic follow-up) and a detailed finite element analysis of a piping elbow are examined. It is found that stress-range dependent material models can have a significant effect on the accepted characteristics of elastic follow-up.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Topics: Creep , Stress , Pipes , Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Robinson, E. L., 1955, “Steam Piping Design to Minimize Creep Concentration,” Trans. ASME, 77, pp. 1147– 1162.
Severud, L. K., 1984, “A Simplified Method of Evaluation for Piping Elastic Follow-Up,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, ASME, San Fransisco, Vol. 1.
Dhalla, A. K., 1984, “Numerical Estimate of Elastic Follow-Up in Piping: Inelastic Evaluation,” Design of Elevated Temperature Piping (PVP-Vol. 86), R. H.Mallett and R. M.Mello, eds., ASME, New York.
Boyle, J. T., and Nakamura, K., 1987, “The Assessment of Elastic Follow-Up in High Temperature Piping Systems—Overall Survey and Theoretical Results,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 29, pp. 167–194. [CrossRef]
Kasahara, N., 2001, “Strain Concentration at Structural Discontinuities and Its Prediction Based on Characteristics of Compliance Change in Structures,” JSME Int. J. Ser. A, 44, pp. 354–361. [CrossRef]
Naugle, F. V., 1984, “Design Guidance for Elastic Follow-Up,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 106, pp. 32–36. [CrossRef]
Hadidi-Moud, S., and Smith, D. J., 2008, “Use of Elastic Follow-Up in Integrity Assessment of Structures,” Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels & Piping Division Conference, Chicago, ASME PVP, New York, Paper No. PVP2008-61754.
Smith, D. J., McFadden, J., Hadidimoud, S., Smith, A. J., Stormonth-Darling, A. J., and Aziz, A. A., 2010, “Elastic Follow-Up and Relaxation of Residual Stress,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 224, pp. 777–787 . [CrossRef]
Hadidi-Moud, S., and Smith, D. J., 2010, “Estimation of Elastic Follow-Up in Structures,” Key Eng. Mater., 462, pp. 361–365. [CrossRef]
British Energy Plant Integrity Branch, 2003, R5, Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures. Issue 3, British Energy Generation Ltd, Barnwood, UK.
Naumenko, K., Altenbach, H., and Gorash, Y., 2009, “Creep Analysis With a Stress Range Dependent Constitutive Model,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 79, pp. 619–630. [CrossRef]
Boyle, J. T., “Stress Relaxation and Elastic Follow-Up Using a Stress Range Dependent Constitutive Model,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Sci. Published Online 21 October 2011. [CrossRef]
Boyle, J. T., and Spence, J., 1983, Stress Analysis for Creep, Butterworths, London.
Naumenko, K., and Altenbach, H., 2007, Modelling of Creep for Structural Analysis, Springer, Berlin.
Evans, R. W., and Wilshire, B., 1985, Creep of Metals and Alloys, Institute of Metals, London.
Robinson, E. L., 1943, “The 100,000-Hour Creep Test,” Mech. Eng., 65, pp. 166–168.
Soderberg, C. R., 1936, “The Interpretation of Creep Tests for Machine Design,” Trans. ASME, 58, pp. 733–743.
Prandtl, L., 1928, “Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinematischen Theorie der festen Korper. Zeitsch,”Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 8, pp. 85–106. [CrossRef]
McVetty, P. G., 1943, “Creep of Metals at Elevated Temperatures—The Hyperbolic Sine Relation Between Stress and Creep Rate,” Trans. ASME, 65, pp. 761–769.
Nadai, A., and McVetty, P. G., 1943, “Hyperbolic Sine Chart for Estimating Working Stresses of Alloys at Elevated Temperature,” Proc. ASTM, 43, pp. 735–745.
Garofalo, F., 1963, “An Empirical Relation Defining the Stress Dependence of Minimum Creep Rate in Metals,” Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 227, pp. 351–355.
Lemaitre, J., and Chaboche, J.-L., 1994, Mechanics of Solid Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Boyle, J. T., “The Creep Behavior of Simple Structures With a Stress Range Dependent Constitutive Model,” Arch. Appl. Mech., SpringerLink Online First™, 23 July 2011.
Holdsworth, S., 2010, “Advances in the Assessment of Creep Data During the Past 100 Years,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 63, pp. 93–99. [CrossRef]
Holdsworth, S. R., Askins, M., Baker, A., Gariboldi, E., Holmström, S., Klenk, A., Ringel, M., Merckling, G., Sandstrom, R., Schwienheer, M., and Spigarelli, S. (on behalf of Working Group 1 of the European Creep Collaborative Committee), 2008, “Factors Influencing Creep Model Equation Selection,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85, pp. 80–88. [CrossRef]
Bolton, J., 2008, “A ‘Characteristic Strain’ Model for Creep,” Mater. High Temp., 25, pp. 101–108. [CrossRef]
Boyle, J. T., 2011, “The Behavior of Structures Based on the Characteristic Strain Model of Creep,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 88, pp. 473–481. [CrossRef]
Evans, R. W., ParkerJ. D., and WilshireB., 1982, Recent Advances in Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, B.Wilshire and D. R. J.Owen, eds., Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK, pp. 135–184.
Levantovsky, A., 2011, MAGICPLOT, http://magicplot.com/
Nakamura, K., and Boyle, J. T., 1987, “The Assessment of Elastic Follow-Up in High Temperature Piping Systems—Some Example Problems,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 29, pp. 249–273. [CrossRef]
ABAQUS, 2011, User’s Manual, Version 6.9, Dessault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence, RI.
ANSYS, 2009, Structural Analysis Guide, Version 12.1. ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
JSME, 2005, JSME S NC2 2005 Code for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Design and Construction for Nuclear Power Plants—Section II Fast Reactor Standards, JSME.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Steady creep of austenitic AISI 316 L(N) 550–650 °C (after Evans et al. [28])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Steady creep of austenitic AISI 316 L(N) 550–650 °C (after Evans et al. [28]): comparison of secondary creep models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Simple two-bar structure subject to a fixed axial displacement, δ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-bar structure: isochronous stress–strain curve for (a) Soderberg model, (b) Prandtl model, (c) CSM model, (d) Naumenko model, n = 5, (e) Garofalo model, n = 3, (f) Garofalo model, n = 5, (g) Lemaitre–Chaboche model, n = 3, and (h) Lemaitre–Chaboche model, n = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

ansys finite element model of a simple piping elbow, geometry from Ref. [30]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Piping elbow: isochronous stress–strain curve for power-law

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Piping elbow: isochronous stress–strain curve for Prandtl law

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Two-bar structure: isochronous stress–strain curve for a power-law model



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In