Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

A Coupling Method for Hydrodynamic Ram Analysis: Experimental and Numerical Investigation

[+] Author and Article Information
Souli Mhamed

Laboratoire de Mécanique de Lille,
Université de Lille 1,
UMR CNRS 8107,
Lille, France

Gabrys Jonathan

The Boeing Company,
Boeing Co., Rotorcraft Division,
Philadelphia, PA 19048

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 23, 2012; final manuscript received February 17, 2013; published online November 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Samir Ziada.

This work is in part a work of the US Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the US Government's contributions.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(1), 011301 (Nov 07, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1100; doi: 10.1115/1.4025342 History: Received July 23, 2012; Revised February 17, 2013

Hydrodynamic pressures generated by a nonexploding projectile penetrating a fuel tank can be very destructive. During the impact, the projectile transfers momentum and kinetic energy to the container through the surrounding fluid. In aerospace industry, hydrodynamic ram effects are identified as an important factor for aircraft vulnerability because fuel tank of the aircraft is the most vulnerable component because the tank represents the largest exposed area to outside projectiles. Understanding the magnitude of the pressure and its distribution inside the tank is critical for designing the structure to survive these incidents. Numerical simulation when validated by tests data is an efficient tool to investigate mechanical phenomena of hydrodynamic ram effects and its damage on the surrounding structure. The main numerical difficulties that can be encountered in this kind of problems and in general penetration problems is the high mesh distortion of the fluid at the fluid–structure interface during projectile penetration. To prevent high mesh distortion of the fluid, a coupling method is used for the fluid as well as a new coupling algorithm is performed at the fluid–structure interface. The coupling method used in the paper has been developed with the collaboration of the first author in the ls-dyna code and validated for several applications in automotive and aerospace industry for fuel sloshing tank and bird impact problems. In this paper, experimental investigation has been performed and predicted pressure is compared with measured pressure for validation. In addition, modeling parameters such as element size and coupling parameters for the fluid structure coupling are investigated. The purpose of the research is to demonstrate the capability and potential of the fluid structure interaction for simulating this type of problems. Different ways to model reflections of pressure waves off the sidewalls are studied as well. Good correlation is achieved for pressure at specific location inside the water tank.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hallquist, J. O., 1998, LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.
Young, D. L., 1982, “Time-Dependent Multi-Material Flow With Large Fluid Distortion,” Numerical Methods for Fluids Dynamics, K. W.Morton and M. J.Baines, eds., Academic, New York.
Aquelet, N., Souli, M., and Olovson, L., 2005, “Euler Lagrange Coupling With Damping Effects: Application to Slamming Problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195, pp. 110–132. [CrossRef]
Longatte, E., Bendjeddou, Z., and Souli, M., 2003, “Application of Arbitrary Lagrange Euler Formulation to Flow-Induced Vibration problems,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 125(4), pp. 411–417. [CrossRef]
Varas, D., Zaera, R., and López-Puente, J., 2009, “Numerical Modelling of the Hydrodynamic Ram Phenomenon,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 36(3), pp. 363–374. [CrossRef]
Benson, D. J., 1992, “Computational Methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian Hydrocodes,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 99, pp. 235–394. [CrossRef]
Colella, P., and Woodward, P. R., 1984, “Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gad-Dynamics Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 54(1), pp. 174–201. [CrossRef]
Aquelet, N., Souli, M., Gabrys, J., and Olovson, L., 2003, “A New ALE Formulation for Sloshing Analysis,” Int. J. Struct. Eng. Mech., 16, pp. 423–440. [CrossRef]
Longatte, E., Verreman, V., and Souli, M., 2009, “Time Marching for Simulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems,” J. Fluids Struct., 25(1), pp. 95–111. [CrossRef]
Souli, M., and Zolesio, J. P., 1993, “Shape Derivative of Discretized Problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 108, pp. 187–199. [CrossRef]
Erchiqui, F., Souli, M., and Ben Yedder, R., 2007, “Nonisothermal Finite-Element Analysis of Thermoforming of Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet: Incomplete Effect of the Forming Stage,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 47(12), pp. 2129–2144. [CrossRef]
Ozdemir, Z., Souli, M., and Fahjan, Y. M., 2010, “Application of Nonlinear Fluid-Structure Interaction Methods to Seismic Analysis of Anchored and Unanchored Tanks,” Eng. Struct., 32(2), pp. 409–423. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Interface between two materials: air and water

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Description of the coupling method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Steel cylinder used for experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cylinder with Mylar Film installed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fifteen pressure gauge locations G1 to G15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Gauge numbering scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Finite element model for analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Symmetry planes in finite element model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure time history at gauge 14

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pressure time history at gauge 13

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pressure time history at gauge 15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure time history at gauge 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pressure time history at gauge 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pressure time history at gauges 9 and 7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pressure history test gauges 8 and 10 and simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Pressure history test gauges 11 and 12 and simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Pressure history for gauge 14 in the two-dimensional model for different scaling factors



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In