Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

The Consequences of Macroscopic Segregation on the Transformation Behavior of a Pressure-Vessel Steel

[+] Author and Article Information
E. J. Pickering

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy,
University of Cambridge,
Pembroke Street,
Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
e-mail: ejp57@cam.ac.uk

H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy,
University of Cambridge,
Pembroke Street,
Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
e-mail: hkdb@cam.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 26, 2013; final manuscript received January 6, 2014; published online February 27, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Osamu Watanabe.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(3), 031403 (Feb 27, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-13-1126; doi: 10.1115/1.4026448 History: Received July 26, 2013; Revised January 06, 2014

It is important that the material used to produce high-integrity pressure vessels has homogeneous properties which are reproducible and within specification. Most heavy pressure vessels comprise large forgings derived from ingots, and are consequently affected by the chemical segregation that occurs during ingot casting. Of particular concern are the compositional variations that arise from macrosegregation, such as the channels of enriched material commonly referred to as A-segregates. By causing corresponding variations in microstructure, the segregation may be detrimental to mechanical properties. It also cannot be removed by any practically feasible heat treatments because of the large scale on which it forms. Here we describe an investigation on the consequences of macrosegregation on the development of microstructure in a pressure-vessel steel, SA508 Grade 3. It is demonstrated that the kinetics of transformation are sensitive to the segregation, resulting in a dramatic spatial variations in microstructure. It is likely therefore that some of the scatter in mechanical properties as observed for such pressure vessels can be attributed to macroscopic casting-induced chemical segregation.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Flemings, M., 1974, Solidification Processing, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dantzig, J., and Rappaz, M., 2009, Solidification, EPFL Press, Switzerland. [PubMed] [PubMed]
Taylor, H., Flemings, M., and Wulff, J., 1959, Foundry Engineering, Wiley, New York.
Marburg, E., 1953, “Accelerated Solidification in Ingots: Its Influence on Ingot Soundness,” J. Metals, pp.157–172.
Maidorn, C., and Blind, B., 1985, “Solidification and Segregation in Heavy Forging Ingots,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 84, pp. 285–296. [CrossRef]
Druce, S., 1979, “Investigation of the Homogeneity of Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties in a Large A508 Class 3 Steel Pressure Vessel Forging,” Report No. AERE-R9581, Sept. 1979.
Kim, S., Im, Y., Lee, S., Lee, H., Oh, Y., and Hong, J., 2001, “Effects of Alloying Elements on Mechanical and Fracture Properties of Base Metals and Simulated Heat-Affected Zones of SA 508 Steels,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 32A, pp. 903–911. [CrossRef]
Im, Y., Oh, Y., Lee, B., Hong, J., and Lee, H., 2001, “Effects of Carbide Precipitation on the Strength and Charpy Impact Properties of Low Carbon Mn–Ni–Mo Bainitic Steels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 297, pp. 138–148. [CrossRef]
Wang, G., and Chen, J., 1996, “A Comparison of Fracture Behavior of Low Alloy Steel with Different Sizes of Carbide Particles,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 27A, pp. 1909–1917. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., Kang, S., Oh, S., Kwon, S., Lee, S., Kim, J., and Hong, J., 2000, “Correlation of the Microstructure and Fracture Toughness of the Heat-Affected Zones of an SA 508 Steel,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 31A, pp. 1107–1119. [CrossRef]
Bowen, P., Druce, S., and Knott, J., 1986. “Effects of Microstructure on Cleavage Fracture in Pressure Vessel Steel,” Acta Metall., 34, pp. 1121–1131. [CrossRef]
Lee, S., Kim, S., Hwang, B., Lee, B., and Lee, C., 2002, “Effect of Carbide Distribution on the Fracture Toughness in the Transition Temperature Region of an SA 508 Steel,” Acta Mater., 50, pp. 4755–4762. [CrossRef]
Im, Y., Lee, B., Oh, Y., Hong, J., and Lee, H., 2004, “Effect of Microstructure on the Cleavage Fracture Strength of Low Carbon Mn–Ni–Mo Bainitic Steels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 324, pp. 33–40. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., Lee, S., Im, Y., Lee, H., Kim, S., and Hong, J., 2004, “Effects of Alloying Elements on Fracture Toughness in the Transition Temperature Region of Base Metals and Simulated Heat-Affected Zones of Mn–Mo–Ni Low-Alloy Steels,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 35A, pp. 2027–2037. [CrossRef]
Lee, B., Hong, J., Yang, W., Huh, M., and Chi, S., 2000, “Master Curve Characterisation of the Fracture Toughness in Unirradiated and Irradiated RPV Steels Using Full and 1/3-Size Pre-Cracked Charpy Specimens,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 77, pp. 599–604. [CrossRef]
Beremin, F., 1984, “A Local Criterion for Cleavage Fracture of a Nuclear Pressure Vessel Steel,” Metall. Trans. A, 14A, pp. 2277–2287.
Kim, J., Kwon, H., Chang, H., and Park, Y., 1997, “Improvement of Impact Toughness of the SA 508 Class 3 Steel for Nuclear Pressure Vessel Through Steel-Making and Heat-Treatment Practices,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 174, pp. 51–58. [CrossRef]
Lee, K., Kim, M., Lee, B., and Wee, D., 2010, “Master Curve Characterisation of the Fracture Toughness Behavior in SA508 Gr.4N Low Alloy Steels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 403, pp. 68–74. [CrossRef]
Yang, H.-S., and Bhadeshia, H., 2007, “Uncertainties in Dilatometric Determination of Martensite Start Temperature,” Mater. Sci. Technol., 23(5), pp. 556–560. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, M., and Bhadeshia, H., 1989, “The Interpretation of Dilatometric Data for Transformations in Steels,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 8, pp. 477–478. [CrossRef]
Lee, B., Kim, M., Yoon, J., and Hong, J., 2010, “Characterisation of High Strength and High Toughness Ni–Mo–Cr Low Alloy Steels for Nuclear Application,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 87, pp. 74–80. [CrossRef]
Curry, D., and Knott, J., 1978, “Effects of Microstructure on Cleavage Fracture Stress in Steel,” Metal Sci., 12, pp. 511–514. [CrossRef]
Curry, D., and Knott, J., 1979, “Effect of Microstructure on Cleavage Fracture Toughness of Quenched and Tempered Steels,” Metal Sci., 13, pp. 341–345. [CrossRef]
Curry, D., 1980, “Comparison Between Two Models of Cleavage Fracture,” Metal Sci., 14, pp. 78–80. [CrossRef]
Wallin, K., 1984, “The Scatter in KIC Results,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 19, pp. 1085–1093. [CrossRef]
Hawthorne, J., 1985. “Composition Influences and Interactions in Radiation Sensitivity of Reactor Vessel Steels,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 89, pp. 223–232. [CrossRef]
Blondeau, R., Maynier, P., Dollet, J., and Viellard-Baron, B., 1976, “Mathematical Model for the Calculation of Mechanical Properties of Low Alloy Steel Metallurgical Products: A Few Examples of Its Applications,” In Heat Treatment’76, Metals Society, Proceedings of the 16th International Heat Treatment Conference, Metals Society, Stratford-upon-Avon, May 6–7, 1976, London, UK.
Ion, J., Easterling, K., and Ashby, M., 1984, “A Second Report on Diagrams of Microstructure and Hardness for Heat-Affected Zones in Welds,” Acta Metall., 32, pp. 1949–1962. [CrossRef]
Pickering, F., 1992, “Structure–Property Relationships in Steels,” Constitution and Properties of Steels, R.Cahn, P.Haasen, E.Kramer, and F.Pickering, eds., Vol. 7 (Materials Science and Technology: A Comprehensive Treatment), VCH, Weinheim, pp. 41–94.
Scheil, E., 1942, “Bemerkungen zur Schichtkristallbildung,” Z. Metallkd., 34, pp. 70–72.
Suzuki, K., and Taniguchi, K., 1981, “The Mechanism of Reducing “A” Segregates in Steels Ingots,” Trans. ISIJ, 21, pp. 235–242. [CrossRef]
Beckermann, C., 2012, private communication.
Beckermann, C., Gu, J., and Boettinger, W., 2000, “Development of a Freckle Predictor via Rayleigh Number Method for Single-Crystal Nickel-Base Superalloy Castings,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 31A, pp. 2545–2557. [CrossRef]
Ramirez, J., and Beckermann, C., 2003, “Evaluation of a Rayleigh-Number-Based Freckle Criterion for Pb–Sn Alloys and Ni-Base Superalloys,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 34A, pp. 1525–1536. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Optical microscopy. (a) Sample with A-segregation, showing region of allotriomorphic ferrite between two enriched areas. (b) Shows the transition from enriched material, ferrite, and widmanstätten ferrite. (c) Region of material without evidence of a-segregation showing band of ferrite within upper-bainite bulk. (d), (e), and (f) show the widmanstätten ferrite, allotriomorphic ferrite, and positively segregated microstructures, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Section of SA508 Grade 3 forging received, roughly prepared, and macroetched. Dark regions are areas of positive segregation. Any horizontal striations are likely caused by the grinding procedure, not macrosegregation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Different types of macrosegregation typically found in large ingots. Positive segregation is denoted by + symbols representing regions enriched in solute, and negative by—for solute-depleted regions. Similar figures can be found in Refs. [1,3] and [4]. (b) Schematic of material removed (shaded) from ingot to produce a typical large shell forging.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Prominent macrosegregation mechanisms in steel ingot casting: (a) interdendritic fluid flow caused by thermosolutal convection (+ symbols denote positive segregation, i.e., regions enriched in solute, whilst the—symbols denote depleted regions), and (b) equiaxed grain sedimentation in the melt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Scanning electron microscopy: (a) secondary-electron image of enriched region and (b) corresponding back-scattered electron image. (c) and (d) are secondary-electron images of the allotriomorphic ferrite and widmanstätten ferrite microstructures, respectively. Blocky areas of retained austenite are evident in (c), and a similar formation is labeled in (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Transmission electron microscopy: (a) widmanstätten ferrite plates at low magnification, showing carbide-free laths separated by pearlitic regions. (b) Lower bainite colonies with coarse carbides. (c) Thin bainitic laths and extensive carbide precipitation within a-segregated material. (d) Twinned martensite within a martensite–austenite island.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Qualitative EPMA mapping showing optical micrograph of region of interest (with A-segregate, allotriomorphic ferrite, and widmanstätten ferrite moving bottom left to top right) alongside maps for Si, Mn, and Mo

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Plot of Mn concentration in the solid (interfacial value) against fraction solid for the steel examined in the study, under non-equilibrium (Scheil [30]) solidification conditions. The dashed line gives the bulk alloy composition. Partition coefficients and liquidus slopes used for calculations were taken from the relevant phase diagrams. Note that the true conditions for solidification of low-alloy steels are likely to be between the ideal equilibrium and non-equilibrium cases.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In