Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Refined General Theory of Stress Analysis for Tubesheet

[+] Author and Article Information
Hongsong Zhu

Independent Researcher,
ShiDa ErCun, Putuo District,
Shanghai 200062, PR China

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 13, 2016; final manuscript received February 7, 2017; published online April 21, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Albert E. Segall.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(4), 041203 (Apr 21, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-16-1076; doi: 10.1115/1.4036139 History: Received May 13, 2016; Revised February 07, 2017

The stress analysis method for fixed tubesheet (TS) heat exchangers (HEX) in pressure vessel codes such as ASME VIII-1, EN13445, and GB151 is based on the classical theory of thin plate on elastic foundation. In addition, these codes all assume a geometric and loading plane of symmetry at the midway between the two TSs so that only half of the unit or one TS is needed to be considered. In this study, a refined general theory of stress analysis for TS is presented which also considers unequal thickness for two TSs, different edge conditions, pressure drop and deadweight on two TSs, the anisotropic behavior of the TS in thickness direction, and transverse shear deformation in TS. Analysis shows floating and U-tube heat exchangers are the two special cases of the refined theory. Theoretical comparison shows that ASME method can be obtained from the special case of the simplified mechanical model of the refined theory. Numerical comparison results indicate that predictions given by the refined theory agree well with finite element analysis (FEA) for both thin and thick TS heat exchangers, while ASME results are not accurate or not correct. Therefore, it is concluded that the presented refined general theory provides a single unified method, dealing with both thin and thick TSs for different type (U type, floating, and fixed) HEXs in equal detail, with confidence to predict design stresses.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Gardner, K. A. , 1948, “ Heat Exchanger Tubesheet Design,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 15(4), pp. 377–385.
Gardner, K. A. , 1952, “ Heat Exchanger Tubesheet Design-2: Fixed Tubesheet,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 19(2), pp. 159–166.
Miller, K. A. G. , 1952, “ The Design of Tube Plates in Heat Exchangers,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Ser. B, 1B(6), pp. 215–231.
Galletly, G. D. , 1959, “ Optimum Design of Thin Circular Plates on an Elastic Foundation,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., London, 173(1), pp. 687–698. [CrossRef]
Hwang, K. C. , Xue, M. D. , and Li, S. Y. , 1980, “ A Proposed Method of Stress Analysis on Fixed Tubesheets of Heat Exchangers,” 4th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, London, May 19–23, Vol. 3, pp. 50–62.
Soler, A. I. , Caldwell, S. M. , and Soler, S. D. , 1990, “ A Proposed ASME Section VIII Division 1 Tubesheet Design Procedure,” ASME PVP Conference, Nashville, TN, June 17–21.
ASME Code, 2015, “ Section VIII-Division 1-2015,” ASME, New York.
EN, 2014, “ Unfired Pressure Vessels, 2014,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, Standard No. EN 13445.
GB/T 151, 2014, “ Chinese National Standard for Heat Exchanger,” Standardization Administration of PRC, Beijing, China.
Porowski, J. S. , and O'Donnell, W. J. , 1978, “ Elastic Design Method for Perforated Plates,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 100(2), pp. 356–362. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H., Zhai, J., Wang, H., and Zheng, Y., 2016, “ A Proposed General Method of Stress Analysis for Tubesheet of Heat Exchanger,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 138(6), p. 061201. [CrossRef]
Ambartsumyan, S. A. , 1970, Theory of Anisotropic Plates, Vol. II, Technomic Publishing, Stamford, CT, p. 41, pp. 48–52, and pp. 139–140.
ASME Code, 2015, “ Section VIII-Division 2-2015,” ASME, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Vertically mounted fixed TS HEX

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sketch of different types of floating TS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of Thick TS radial stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of tube axial stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of Thick TS radial stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of tube axial stress




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In