Research Papers: Pipeline Systems

Electrochemical Corrosion Finite Element Analysis and Burst Pressure Prediction of Externally Corroded Underground Gas Transmission Pipelines

[+] Author and Article Information
Ibrahim M. Gadala

Department of Materials Engineering,
The University of British Columbia,
309-6350 Stores Road,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Magd Abdel Wahab

Division of Computational Mechanics,
Ton Duc Thang University,
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
Faculty of Civil Engineering,
Ton Duc Thang University,
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
Soete Laboratory,
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture,
Ghent University,
Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 903,
Zwijnaarde B-9052, Belgium
e-mails: magd.abdelwahab@tdt.edu.vn; magd.abdelwahab@ugent.be

Akram Alfantazi

Department of Materials Engineering,
The University of British Columbia,
309-6350 Stores Road,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
Department of Chemical Engineering,
The Petroleum Institute,
P.O. Box 2533,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 1, 2016; final manuscript received September 18, 2017; published online December 4, 2017. Editor: Young W. Kwon.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 140(1), 011701 (Dec 04, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: PVT-16-1207; doi: 10.1115/1.4038224 History: Received November 01, 2016; Revised September 18, 2017

An integrative numerical simulation approach for pipeline integrity analysis is presented in this work, combining a corrosion model, which is the main focus of this paper, with a complementary structural nonlinear stress analysis, using the finite element method (FEM). Potential distributions in the trapped water existing beneath pipeline coating disbondments are modeled in conjunction with reaction kinetics on the corroding exposed steel surface using a moving boundary mesh. Temperature dependencies (25 °C and 50 °C) of reaction kinetics do not greatly affect final corrosion defect geometries after 3-yr simulation periods. Conversely, cathodic protection (CP) levels and pH dependencies within the near-neutral pH range (6.7–8.5) strongly govern depth profiles caused by corrosion, reaching a maximum of ∼3 mm into the pipeline wall. A 0.25 V amplification of CP potential combined with a 0.5 mm widening in disbondment opening size reduces defect penetration by almost 30%. Resulting corrosion defect geometries are used for stress examinations and burst pressure evaluations. Furthermore, nonlinear elastic–plastic stress analysis is carried out using shell elements in order to predict the burst pressure of corroded pipes. Corrosion is modeled by reducing the stiffness of a damaged element that has the dimensions of the defect. The predicted burst pressures are in good agreement with those obtained using an experimental-based formula.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


ASME, 2012, “ Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines (Supplement to ANSI/ASME b31 Code for Pressure Piping),” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. B31G-2012. http://files.asme.org/Catalog/Codes/PrintBook/33501.pdf
Kiefner, J. F. , and Vieth, P. H. , 1990, “ Evaluating Pipe–1. New Method Corrects Criterion for Evaluating Corroded Pipe,” Oil Gas J., 88(32). http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-88/issue-32/in-this-issue/general-interest/evaluating-pipe-1-new-method-corrects-criterion-for-evaluating-corroded-pipe.html
Kiefner, J. F. , and Vieth, P. H. , 2016, “ Evaluating Pipe-Conclusion PC Program Speeds New Criterion for Evaluating Corroded Pipe,” Oil Gas J., 88(32). http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-88/issue-34/in-this-issue/production/evaluating-pipe-conclusion-pc-program-speeds-new-criterion-for-evaluating-corroded-pipe.html
Netto, T. A. , Ferraz, U. S. , and Estefen, S. F. , 2005, “ The Effect of Corrosion Defects on the Burst Pressure of Pipelines,” J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(8), pp. 1185–1204. [CrossRef]
Fekete, G. , and Varga, L. , 2012, “ The Effect of the Width to Length Ratios of Corrosion Defects on the Burst Pressures of Transmission Pipelines,” Eng. Failure Anal., 21, pp. 21–30. [CrossRef]
Chiodo, M. S. G. , and Ruggieri, C. , 2009, “ Failure Assessments of Corroded Pipelines With Axial Defects Using Stress-Based Criteria: Numerical Studies and Verification Analyses,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 86(2–3), pp. 164–176. [CrossRef]
Dotta, F. , and Ruggieri, C. , 2004, “ Structural Integrity Assessments of High Pressure Pipelines With Axial Flaws Using a Micromechanics Model,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 81(9), pp. 761–770. [CrossRef]
Government of Canada, 2002, “ Public Inquiry Concerning Stress Corrosion Cracking on Canadian Oil and Gas Pipelines,” Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, accessed Oct. 18, 2013, http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/418383/publication.html
Lu, B. T. , Luo, J. L. , and Norton, P. R. , 2010, “ Environmentally Assisted Cracking Mechanism of Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Groundwater,” Corros. Sci., 52(5), pp. 1787–1795. [CrossRef]
Benmoussa, A. , Hadjel, M. , and Traisnel, M. , 2006, “ Corrosion Behavior of API 5 L X-60 Pipeline Steel Exposed to Near-Neutral pH Soil Simulating Solution,” Mater. Corros., 57(10), pp. 771–777. [CrossRef]
Gadala, I. M. , and Alfantazi, A. , 2014, “ Electrochemical Behavior of API-X100 Pipeline Steel in NS4, Near-Neutral, and Mildly Alkaline pH Simulated Soil Solutions,” Corros. Sci., 82, pp. 45–57. [CrossRef]
He, D. X. , Chen, W. , and Luo, J. L. , 2004, “ Effect of Cathodic Potential on Hydrogen Content in a Pipeline Steel Exposed to NS4 Near-Neutral pH Soil Solution,” Corrosion, 60(8), pp. 778–786. [CrossRef]
Chen, W. , Kania, R. , Worthingham, R. , and Boven, G. V. , 2009, “ Transgranular Crack Growth in the Pipeline Steels Exposed to Near-Neutral pH Soil Aqueous Solutions: The Role of Hydrogen,” Acta Mater., 57(20), pp. 6200–6214. [CrossRef]
Gu, B. , Yu, W. Z. , Luo, J. L. , and Mao, X. , 1999, “ Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of X-80 and X-52 Pipeline Steels in Dilute Aqueous Solution With Near-Neutral pH,” Corrosion, 55(3), pp. 312–318. [CrossRef]
Parkins, R. N. , Blanchard, W. K. , and Delanty, B. S. , 1994, “ Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of High-Pressure Pipelines in Contact With Solutions of Near Neutral pH,” Corrosion, 50(5), pp. 394–408. [CrossRef]
Yan, L. , Worthingham, R. , King, F. , and Been, J. , 2012, “ Factors Affecting the Generation of High-pH Environments Required for Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC),” ASME Paper No. IPC2012-90515.
Cheng, Y. F. , 2007, “ Fundamentals of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Its Implications on Near-Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipelines,” Electrochim. Acta, 52(7), pp. 2661–2667. [CrossRef]
Revie, R. W. , 2015, Oil and Gas Pipelines: Integrity and Safety Handbook, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Bai, Y. , and Bai, Q. , 2014, “ Corrosion and Corroded Pipelines,” Subsea Pipeline Integrity and Risk Management, Y. B. Bai , ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham, MA, Chap. 1. [CrossRef]
Durr, C. L. , and Beavers, J. A. , 1998, “ Techniques for Assessment of Soil Corrosivity,” CORROSION, San Diego, CA, Mar. 22–27, SPE Paper No. NACE-98667. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/NACE-98667
Jones, D. A. , 1995, Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Rabiot, D. , Dalard, F. , Rameau, J.-J. , Caire, J.-P. , and Boyer, S. , 1999, “ Study of Sacrificial Anode Cathodic Protection of Buried Tanks: Numerical Modelling,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 29(5), pp. 541–550. [CrossRef]
Miltiadou, P. , and Wrobel, L. C. , 2002, “ Optimization of Cathodic Protection Systems Using Boundary Elements and Genetic Algorithms,” Corrosion, 58(11), pp. 912–921. [CrossRef]
Martinez, S. , and Štern, I. , 2000, “ A Mathematical Model for the Internal Cathodic Protection of Cylindrical Structures by Wire Anodes,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 30(9), pp. 1053–1060. [CrossRef]
Gadala, I. M. , Abdel Wahab, M. , and Alfantazi, A. , 2016, “ Numerical Simulations of Soil Physicochemistry and Aeration Influences on the External Corrosion and Cathodic Protection Design of Buried Pipeline Steels,” Mater. Des., 97, pp. 287–299. [CrossRef]
Perdomo, J. J. , Chabica, M. E. , and Song, I. , 2001, “ Chemical and Electrochemical Conditions on Steel Under Disbonded Coatings: The Effect of Previously Corroded Surfaces and Wet and Dry Cycles,” Corros. Sci., 43(3), pp. 515–532. [CrossRef]
Nešić, S. , and Lee, K.-L. J. , 2003, “ A Mechanistic Model for Carbon Dioxide Corrosion of Mild Steel in the Presence of Protective Iron Carbonate Films—Part 3: Film Growth Model,” Corrosion, 59(7), pp. 616–628. [CrossRef]
Song, F. M. , Kirk, D. W. , Graydon, J. W. , and Cormack, D. E. , 2004, “ Predicting Carbon Dioxide Corrosion of Bare Steel Under an Aqueous Boundary Layer,” Corrosion, 60(8), pp. 736–748. [CrossRef]
Riemer, D. P. , and Orazem, M. E. , 2000, “ Application of Boundary Element Models to Predict Effectiveness of Coupons for Accessing Cathodic Protection of Buried Structures,” Corrosion, 56(8), pp. 794–800. [CrossRef]
Muehlenkamp, E. B. , Koretsky, M. D. , and Westall, J. C. , 2005, “ Effect of Moisture on the Spatial Uniformity of Cathodic Protection of Steel in Reinforced Concrete,” Corrosion, 61(6), pp. 519–533. [CrossRef]
Nafisi, S. , Arafin, M. , Glodowski, R. , Collins, L. , and Szpunar, J. , 2014, “ Impact of Vanadium Addition on API X100 Steel,” ISIJ Int., 54(10), pp. 2404–2410. [CrossRef]
G01 Committee, 2011, “ Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM G1-03(2011). https://www.astm.org/Standards/G1.htm
Meng, G. Z. , Zhang, C. , and Cheng, Y. F. , 2008, “ Effects of Corrosion Product Deposit on the Subsequent Cathodic and Anodic Reactions of X-70 Steel in Near-Neutral pH Solution,” Corros. Sci., 50(11), pp. 3116–3122. [CrossRef]
TransCanada, 2013, “ Pipeline Temperature Effects Study—Keystone XL Project,” TransCanada Corporation, Calgary, AB, Canada. https://2012-keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/205567.pdf
Gulf Interstate Engineering, 1998, “Temporary Right-of-Way Width Requirements for Pipeline Construction,” Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Foundation, Houston, TX. http://www.ingaa.org/File.aspx?id=19105
Kranc, S. C. , and Sagüés, A. A. , 2001, “ Detailed Modeling of Corrosion Macrocells on Steel Reinforcing in Concrete,” Corros. Sci., 43(7), pp. 1355–1372. [CrossRef]
Campbell, G. S. , Jungbauer, J. D. J. , Bidlake, W. R. , and Hungerford, R. D. , 1994, “ Predicting the Effect of Temperature on Soil Thermal Conductivity,” Soil Sci., 158(5), pp. 307–313. [CrossRef]
Eslami, A. , Kania, R. , Worthingham, B. , Boven, G. V. , Eadie, R. , and Chen, W. , 2013, “ Corrosion of X-65 Pipeline Steel Under a Simulated Cathodic Protection Shielding Coating Disbondment,” Corrosion, 69(11), pp. 1103–1110. [CrossRef]
Eslami, A. , Fang, B. , Kania, R. , Worthingham, B. , Been, J. , Eadie, R. , and Chen, W. , 2010, “ Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation Under the Disbonded Coating of Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Environment,” Corros. Sci., 52(11), pp. 3750–3756. [CrossRef]
Eslami, A. , Kania, R. , Worthingham, B. , Boven, G. V. , Eadie, R. , and Chen, W. , 2011, “ Effect of CO2 and R-Ratio on near-Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking Initiation Under a Disbonded Coating of Pipeline Steel,” Corros. Sci., 53(6), pp. 2318–2327. [CrossRef]
Frankel, G. S. , 1998, “ Pitting Corrosion of Metals a Review of the Critical Factors,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 145(6), pp. 2186–2198. [CrossRef]
ASM International, 2000, Corrosion: Understanding the Basics, R. Davis , ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Kranc, S. C. , and Sagüés, A. A. , 1994, “ Computation of Reinforcing Steel Corrosion Distribution in Concrete Marine Bridge Substructures,” Corrosion, 50(1), pp. 50–61. [CrossRef]
Stern, M. , and Geary, A. L. , 1957, “ Electrochemical Polarization I. A Theoretical Analysis of the Shape of Polarization Curves,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 104(1), pp. 56–63. [CrossRef]
McCafferty, E. , 2005, “ Validation of Corrosion Rates Measured by the Tafel Extrapolation Method,” Corrosion Science, 47(12), pp. 3202–3215. [CrossRef]
Mao, X. , Liu, X. , and Revie, R. W. , 1994, “ Pitting Corrosion of Pipeline Steel in Dilute Bicarbonate Solution With Chloride Ions,” Corrosion, 50(9), pp. 651–657. [CrossRef]
Zhang, L. , Li, X. G. , Du, C. W. , and Cheng, Y. F. , 2009, “ Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of X70 Pipeline Steel in a CO2-Containing Solution,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 18(3), pp. 319–323. [CrossRef]
Castro, E. B. , Valentini, C. R. , Moina, C. A. , Vilche, J. R. , and Arvia, A. J. , 1986, “ The Influence of Ionic Composition on the Electrodissolution and Passivation of Iron Electrodes in Potassium Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solutions in the 8.4–10.5 pH Range at 25 °C,” Corros. Sci., 26(10), pp. 781–793. [CrossRef]
De Waard, C. , and Milliams, D. E. , 1975, “ Carbonic Acid Corrosion of Steel,” Corrosion, 31(5), pp. 177–181. [CrossRef]
Gadala, I. M. , and Alfantazi, A. , 2015, “ Low Alloy X100 Pipeline Steel Corrosion and Passivation Behavior in Bicarbonate-Based Solutions of pH 6.7 to 8.9 With Groundwater Anions: An Electrochemical Study,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 46(7), pp. 3104–3116. [CrossRef]
Owen, D. R. J. , 1980, Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice, E. Hinton , ed., Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) 3D representation of steel pipeline buried 1 m below ground surface; (b) 2D cross section of pipeline in longitudinal plane with coating defect (zoomed section), dimensions, and mesh of trapped water region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Intact pipe finite element shell model for stress analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensions of corrosion defect [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Modeling of corrosion defect in the shell model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Polarization profiles of X100 specimen immersed in different temperature and %CO2 environments, obtained through electrochemical corrosion experiments: (a) LPR fitting results at potentials < OCP; (b) cathodic regime of PDP results, with regression fits; and (c) anodic regime of PDP results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum depth (mm) of corrosion defect (ddefect_max) below original steel surface from 0 to 150 weeks of exposure, for all Eapp, coating disbondment opening, and Twall values simulated: (a) Twall = 25 °C and (b) Twall = 50 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Length of corrosion defect (ldefect) (cm) along exposed steel surface and x-position of ddefect_max (maximum defect depth) (cm) reached during 0–150 weeks of exposure, for all Eapp, coating disbondment opening, and Twall values simulated: (a) illustration of plotted parameters, (b) ldefect for Twall = 25 °C, (c) ldefect for Twall = 50 °C, (d) x-position of ddefect_max for Twall = 25 °C, and (e) x-position of ddefect_max for Twall = 50 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Timeline of corrosion defect shape growth on exposed steel surface and φ evolution throughout the exposure, for Eapp = −1 VSCE, 1 mm coating disbondment opening, and Twall = 25 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Convergence profiles of interfacial surface-electrolyte potential parameter (Es) averaged over full length of exposed steel surface (Es_average), for coarse, normal, and fine mesh resolutions



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In