0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Design of CaO–SiO2–CaF2 and CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 Based Submerged Arc Fluxes for Series of Bead on Plate Pipeline Steel Welds—Effect on Carbon and Manganese Content, Grain Size and Microhardness

[+] Author and Article Information
Lochan Sharma

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Indian Institute of Technology,
Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342037, India
e-mail: sharma.11@iitj.ac.in

Rahul Chhibber

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Indian Institute of Technology,
Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342037, India
e-mail: rahul_chhibber@iitj.ac.in

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 11, 2018; final manuscript received March 20, 2019; published online April 11, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Bostjan Bezensek.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 141(3), 031403 (Apr 11, 2019) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-18-1153; doi: 10.1115/1.4043298 History: Received August 11, 2018; Revised March 20, 2019

Submerged arc welding is mainly used to weld high thickness steel plates in various applications such as offshore oil drilling platforms, bridges, building construction, and pressure vessels. Suitable flux composition and welding parameters play an important role in determining the good bead quality, which further affects the mechanical properties of welded joint. Agglomerated fluxes were formulated based on CaO–SiO2–CaF2 and CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 flux system using constrained mixture design and extreme vertices design approach. The chemical compositions of the bead on plate have been studied using formulated fluxes. Twenty one beads on plate experiments were conducted at constant current, voltage, and welding speed using submerged arc welding process. In the present study, chemical composition, grain size, and microhardness properties of series of bead on plate weld deposits (for API 5 L X70 grade pipe line) were optimized by using multiobjective optimization approach.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Parmar, R. S. , 1992, Welding Processes and Technology, Khanna Publishers, New Delhi, India.
Kanjilal, P. , Pal, T. K. , and Majumdar, S. K. , 2006, “ Combined Effect of Flux and Welding Parameters on Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties of Submerged Arc Weld Metal,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 171(2), pp. 223–231. [CrossRef]
Chai, C. S. , and Eagar, T. W. , 1980, “ Effect of SAW Parameters on Weld Metal Chemistry,” Weld. Res. Suppl., 1, pp. 93-s–98-s.
Mitra, U. , and Eagar, T. W. , 1984, “ Slag Metal Reactions During Submerged Arc Welding of Alloy Steels,” Metall. Trans. A, 15(1), pp. 217–227. [CrossRef]
Anderson, V. L. , and McLean, R. A. , 1974, Design of Experiments: A Realistic Approach, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Cornell, J. A. , 2011, Experiments With Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data, Wiley, New York.
Adeyeye, A. D. , and Oyawale, F. A. , 2008, “ Mixture Experiments and Their Applications in Welding Flux Design,” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 30(4), pp. 319–326. [CrossRef]
Jindal, S. , Chhibber, R. , and Mehta, N. P. , 2013, “ Investigation on Flux Design for Submerged Arc Welding of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 227(3), pp. 383–395. [CrossRef]
Bhandari, D. , Chhibber, R. , Arora, N. , and Mehta, R. , 2016, “ Investigation of TiO2–SiO2–CaO–CaF2 Based Electrode Coatings on Weld Metal Chemistry and Mechanical Behaviour of Bimetallic Welds,” J. Manuf. Process., 23, pp. 61–74. [CrossRef]
Eriksson, G. , and Pelton, A. D. , 1993, “ Critical Evaluation and Optimization of Thermodynamic Properties and Phase Diagrams of the CaO–Al2O3, Al2O3–SiO2 and CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 Systems,” Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 24(5), pp. 807–816. [CrossRef]
Sharma, L. , and Chhibber, R. , 2019, “ Design and Development of Submerged Arc Welding Slags Using CaO-SiO2-CaF2 and CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 System,” Silicon (epub).
Bhandari, D. , Chhibber, R. , and Arora, N. , 2012, “ Effect of Electrode Coatings on Diffusible Hydrogen Content, Hardness and Microstructures of the Ferritic Heat Affected Zones in Bimetallic Welds,” Adv. Mater. Res., 383, pp. 4697–4701.
Bang, K-. S. , Park, C. , Jung, H-. C. , and Lee, J-. B. , 2009, “ Effects of Flux Composition on the Element Transfer and Mechanical Properties of Weld Metal in Submerged Arc Welding,” Met. Mater. Int., 15(3), pp. 471–477. [CrossRef]
Chai, C. S. , and Eagar, T. W. , 1981, “ Slag-Metal Equilibrium During Submerged Arc Welding,” Metall. Trans. B, 12B, pp. 539–547. [CrossRef]
North, T. H. , Bell, H. B. , Nowicki, A. , and Craig, I. , 1978, “ Slag/Metal Interaction, Oxygen and Toughness in Submerged Arc Welding,” Weld. J., 57, p. 63.
Parmar, R. S. , 2015, Welding Engineering and Technology, Khanna Publishers, New Delhi, India.
Derringer, G. , and Suich, R. , 1980, “ Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables,” J. Qual. Technol., 12(4), pp. 214–219. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Phase diagrams of (a) SiO2–CaO–CaF2 and (b) SiO2–CaO–Al2O3 system [6,10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Three-dimensional diagram [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Macro examination of bead profile at 4× magnification using stereo microscope: (a) bead profile for flux 12 and (b) bead profile for flux 17

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Series of bead on plate weld deposits performed on API X70 plate (size 290 × 290 × 22 mm3) using submerged arc welding machine, (b) chemical analysis of bead performed using atomic absorption spectrometer (e.g., for bead 12) at midlength, and (c) microhardness measurements at midlength of weld bead deposit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of flux basicity index on average grain size during series of bead on plate weld deposits. Note: BI = ∑ Basic oxides/∑ Acidic oxides.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Effect of basicity index on resulting average grain size for different flux compositions and (b) variation of average grain size with basicity index at cross section of bead for different flux compositions (e.g., for fluxes 2, 3, 7, 13, 17, and 19)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Predicted versus actual values for chemical composition of series of bead on plate weld deposits, grain size, and microhardness properties (a) C, (b) Mn, (c) GS, and (d) MH

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Microstructure examination for series of bead on plate weld deposit specimens at 200× magnification: (a) for bead 13 and (b) for bead 17

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contour surface plots for chemical composition of series of bead on plate weld deposits properties: (a) C, (b) Mn, (c) GS, and (d) MH

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In