Abstract

The paper describes a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of the gas turbine combined cycle (CC) equipped with pressure gain combustion (PGC) based on the Humphrey cycle. PGC is represented by a steady-state zero-dimensional constant volume combustion (CVC) model with practical loss models for a realistic interpretation. Simulations were performed in WTEMP (web-based thermo-economic modular program) software, a modular cycle analysis tool developed at the University of Genova. PGC gas turbine combined cycle is studied using methane as fuel with three different configurations of heat recovery steam generator, namely, one pressure level without reheat, two pressure levels with reheat and three pressure levels with reheat, in order to study a wide range of CC applications. An on-design performance map of the PGC gas turbine is presented, and a sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the impact of cycle loss parameters and turbine cooling technology. Results were analyzed at the optimistic and realistic PGC loss scenarios. For the PGC open cycle, with optimistic combustor losses, efficiency was higher than Joule at all operating conditions. However, with realistic combustor losses, a higher turbine inlet temperature (TIT) was found to alleviate some of the losses in the combustor, and at a pressure ratio of 25, a 1700 °C TIT cycle showed a benefit of 1.7 p.p., while 1300 °C TIT showed no advantage. Moreover, with the reduction in first turbine stage efficiency from pulsating outflow, only the high TIT cycle showed benefit at pressure ratios less than 15. Looking into combined cycles with realistic combustor losses, PGC was found to be advantageous in terms of specific work but not efficiency at actual operating conditions. However, with a further reduction of combustor-related losses, the PGC CC could outperform the Joule equivalent in terms of efficiency. The sensitivity analysis with losses showed that the mitigation of constant pressure combustion loss is more important than the inlet pressure loss for PGC in CC application. Finally, it was shown that the improvements in turbine cooling technology could increase the efficiency of a high TIT PGC combined cycle by 0.25 p.p. and specific work output by 4.1 p.p.

References

1.
Stathopoulos
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Comprehensive Thermodynamic Analysis of the Humphrey Cycle for Gas Turbines With Pressure Gain Combustion
,”
Energies
,
11
(
12
), p.
3521
.10.3390/en11123521
2.
Lu
,
F. K.
,
Braun
,
E. M.
, and
Powers
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Rotating Detonation Wave Propulsion: Experimental Challenges, Modeling, and Engine Concepts
,”
J. Propuls. Power
,
30
(
5
), pp.
1125
1142
.10.2514/1.B34802
3.
Neumann
,
N.
,
Woelki
,
D.
, and
Peitsch
,
D.
,
2019
, “
A Comparison of Steady-State Models for Pressure Gain Combustion in Gas Turbine Performance Simulation
,”
Proceedings of Global Power and Propulsion Society
, Beijing, China, Sept. 16–18.10.33737/gpps19-bj-198
4.
Heiser
,
W. H.
, and
Pratt
,
D. T.
,
2002
, “
Thermodynamic Cycle Analysis of Pulse Detonation Engines
,”
J. Propuls. Power
,
18
(
1
), pp.
68
76
.10.2514/2.5899
5.
Nalim
,
M. R.
,
2002
, “
Thermodynamic Limits of Work and Pressure Gain in Combustion and Evaporation Processes
,”
J. Propuls. Power
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1176
1182
.10.2514/2.6076
6.
Paxson
,
D.
, and
Kaemming
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Foundational Performance Analyses of Pressure Gain Combustion Thermodynamic Benefits for Gas Turbines
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2012-0770.10.2514/6.2012-0770
7.
Nordeen
,
C. A.
,
2013
,
Thermodynamics of a Rotating Detonation Engine
,
University of Connecticut
,
Ph.D. thesis
, Mansfield, CT.https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/dissertations/277/
8.
Wilcock
,
R. C.
,
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
2002
, “
Gas Properties as a Limit to Gas Turbine Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2002-30517.10.1115/GT2002-30517
9.
Guha
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Performance and Optimization of Gas Turbines With Real Gas Effects
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A
,
215
(
4
), pp.
507
512
.10.1243/0957650011538631
10.
Wilcock
,
R. C.
,
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
2005
, “
The Effect of Turbine Blade Cooling on the Cycle Efficiency of Gas Turbine Power Cycles
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(
1
), pp.
109
120
.10.1115/1.1805549
11.
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
Watson
,
D. T.
, and
Jones
,
T. V.
,
2001
, “
Limitations of Gas Turbine Performance Imposed by Large Turbine Cooling Flows
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
123
(
3
), pp.
487
494
.10.1115/1.1373398
12.
Gülen
,
S. C.
,
2017
, “
Pressure Gain Combustion Advantage in Land-Based Electric Power Generation
,”
J. Glob. Power Propuls. Soc.
,
1
, p.
K4MD26
.10.22261/JGPPS.K4MD26
13.
Holley
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Combined Cycle Power Generation Employing Pressure Gain Combustion
,” DOE-United Technologies Research Center-24011, East Hartford, CT, Report.10.2172/1356814
14.
Stathopoulos
,
P.
,
2020
, “
An Alternative Architecture of the Humphrey Cycle and the Effect of Fuel Type on Its Efficiency
,”
Energy Sci. Eng.
,
8
(
10
), pp.
3702
3716
.10.1002/ese3.776
15.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Wilcock
,
R. C.
,
2002
, “
Modeling the Air-Cooled Gas Turbine: Part 1-General Thermodynamics
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
2
), pp.
207
213
.10.1115/1.1415037
16.
Traverso
,
A.
,
Massardo
,
A. F.
,
Cazzola
,
W.
, and
Lagorio
,
G.
,
2004
, “
Widget-Temp: A Novel Web-Based Approach For Thermoeconomic Analysis And Optimization Of Conventional And Innovative Cycles
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-54115.10.1115/GT2004-54115
17.
Ghigliazza
,
F.
,
Traverso
,
A.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
,
2009
, “
Thermoeconomic Impact on Combined Cycle Performance of Advanced Blade Cooling Systems
,”
Appl. Energy
,
86
(
10
), pp.
2130
2140
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.01.023
18.
Kurzke
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Performance Modeling Methodology: Efficiency Definitions for Cooled Single and Multistage Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2002-30497.10.1115/GT2002-30497
19.
Hishida
,
M.
,
Fujiwara
,
T.
, and
Wolanski
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Fundamentals of Rotating Detonations
,”
Shock Waves
,
19
(
1
), pp.
1
10
.10.1007/s00193-008-0178-2
20.
Schwer
,
D.
, and
Kailasanath
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Physics of Rotating-Detonation-Engines
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
33
(
2
), pp.
2195
2202
.10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.050
21.
Bykovskii
,
F. A.
, and
Vedernikov
,
E. F.
,
2003
, “
Continuous Detonation of a Subsonic Flow of a Propellant
,”
Combust. Explos. Shock Waves
,
39
(
3
), pp.
323
334
.10.1023/A:1023800521344
22.
Neumann
,
N.
, and
Peitsch
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Potentials for Pressure Gain Combustion in Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
,”
Appl. Sci.
,
9
(
16
), p. 3211
.10.3390/app9163211
23.
Xisto
,
C.
,
Petit
,
O.
,
Grönstedt
,
T.
,
Rolt
,
A.
,
Lundbladh
,
A.
, and
Paniagua
,
G.
,
2018
, “
The Efficiency of a Pulsed Detonation Combustor–Axial Turbine Integration
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
82–83
, pp.
80
91
.10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.038
24.
Cambier
,
J. L.
, and
Tegnér
,
J. K.
,
1998
, “
Strategies for Pulsed Detonation Engine Performance Optimization
,”
J. Propuls. Power
,
14
(
4
), pp.
489
498
.10.2514/2.5305
25.
Suresh
,
A.
,
Hofer
,
D. C.
, and
Tangirala
,
V. E.
,
2011
, “
Turbine Efficiency for Unsteady, Periodic Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
3
), p. 034501.10.1115/1.4003246
26.
Fernelius
,
M. H.
, and
Gorrell
,
S. E.
,
2017
, “
Predicting Efficiency of a Turbine Driven by Pulsing Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63490.10.1115/GT2017-63490
27.
Gülen
,
S.
,
2019
,
Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Plants
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
28.
Ol'khovskii
,
G. G.
,
2021
, “
The Most Powerful Power-Generating GTUs (A Review)
,”
Therm. Eng.
,
68
(
6
), pp.
490
495
.10.1134/S0040601521060069
29.
Kehlhofer
,
R.
, Rukes, B., Hannemann, F., and Stirnimann, F.,
2009
,
Combined-Cycle Gas and Steam Turbine Power Plants
, 3rd Edition,
PennWell Corp
, Tulsa, OK.https://pennwellbooks.com/combined-cycle-gassteam-turbine-power-plants-3rd-edition-book-kehlhofer-rukes-hannemann-stirnimann-9781593701680/
You do not currently have access to this content.